On The SCOTUS Same-Sex Marriage Ruling: To What Peril, Now, US?

Phyllis Beveridge Nissila

This commentary is not for anyone looking to hop on an emotional roller coaster over the recent Supreme Court decision regarding the legality of same-sex marriage. Rather, it is a call to look at a much bigger and, I believe, more serious issue, for all of us, i.e., what just happened to the Law of the Land, a.k.a. the United States Constitution, in our Representative Republic, a.k.a. this nation “of the people, by the people, and for the people”. It isn’t the only ruling of late to do so, but one of the most highly-profiled and emotionally-charged.

This commentary is also about why all of us, whether pro, con, or neutral, should be very concerned [1].

In a nutshell:

I am among those who believe that for the SCOTUS, or Judicial Branch of the government, to usurp the right to make law (they are limited to judicial review for Constitutionality) which is really the role of the Legislative Branch of our government, or Congress [2], is to set a precedent that opens the door to rule no longer of, for, and by the people, as noted above, but to hand the process over to unelected judges who may rule for life (unless impeached) and who are appointed by politicians. Politicians, whether on the left, right, or middle who might have an intention other than to support the nation as founded and preserved to recent times.

Politicians who might, in fact, even want to transform this government into another kind of government altogether.

But whatever the reason, in effect, the process by which Americans have been privileged and protected since our inception–that of the right to representation—has been seriously damaged if not, as some believe, even destroyed by the means whereby this ruling came to be.

Such a ruling/law enacted by the SCOTUS also defies the right of the states to rule of their own accord (see also footnote 2). In other words, all those referendums grass-roots groups labor diligently to get on their states’ ballots, whatever their political persuasion, that are then passed by the voters of the state, could now be invalidated if the SCOTUS so deems.

But what about bad laws, or laws that are, in fact, not Constitutional?

There is already a protocol in place to override them (see also footnote 2). We enjoy the right in this nation to amend our Constitution and have done so numerous times. The separation of powers is also under-girded with checks and balances to address that possibility in the process, long before a bad law might be enacted.

So why the concern?

Because of the unintended (and some, no doubt, intended) consequences.

In short, I agree with those who argue the following possible consequences:

  • The majority opinion opens the door wide, if not completely, to the destruction of representation of, by, and for the people.
  • The opinion makes it possible, now, for any ruling political party to override the separation of powers and the system of checks and balances designed to maintain that separation.
  • The opinion creates the potential for some new political entity to assume power and override the rule of law in our nation.
  • The opinion may well imperil the very new-found right same-sex marriage activists have won by this ruling, not to mention other rights. As one of the dissenting judges, Samuel Alito, put it:

“Even enthusiastic supporters of same-sex marriage should worry about the scope of   the power that today’s majority claims,” Alito writes. “Today’s decision shows that decades of attempts to restrain this Court’s abuse of its authority have failed“ [3].

  • And one more possible unintended consequence of this ruling must be considered by everyone on both sides of the debate, particularly in the current state of the world. It is illustrated by this “hypothetical” situation:

What if, say, an enemy of our form of government and our culture, including an enemy of the so-called “gay culture,” gains access by covert means by, say, remaining “unnamed,” as it were, thus enjoying relatively unfettered entrance to, and influence in, the country; and what if by more overt means of, say, establishing its own legal enclaves in certain towns, cities, or regions of the country, and/or by gaining access by appointment (via a sympathetic administration) to, say, federal courts, even the SCOTUS, it gains the potential to hold judicial power over all of us?

And what if, say, this enemy eventually gains enough of this access—and power because our original, protective three-branch governmental system has been breached–to legislate their own version of the law of the land and thereby cause the nation to arrive at a tipping point of change where we no longer even recognize our own legal and cultural roots—and protections?

And worse, what if, say, this enemy has cultural beliefs they want to impose that are also foreign to this nation’s (arguably, Judeo-Christian) beliefs and this enemy opposes such newly deemed rights such as, say, the right of homosexuals to marry, let alone have “free expression (of their lifestyle) thereof”? Or even any other traditional rights defined in and established by our Constitution?

Further, what if this enemy has proved that they are even willing to, say, punish those who hold opposing views and practices by imposing heavy taxes and fines, by stripping them of their rights, by imprisoning them–or worse?

What if? …

We ignore such unintended consequences and possibilities to our peril, which is why many, including the dissenting Justices, fear what the SCOTUS just did to our representative republic form of government may have heralded a new and very dangerous era for this nation, whether or not such an extreme case as I have presented might actually become a reality. There are innumerable other possibilities that might ensue with the door now opened.

I know the issue of homosexuals’ right to marry is a highly emotionally-charged issue on both sides of the debate. It has been brilliantly, I would say, taken off of the far less appealing (and much less interesting) Constitutionality debate table and successfully argued via very clever use of the rhetoric of tolerance which Americans have always been very keen on preserving and rightfully so.

Social and traditional media have been saturated, if you will, with the potency of the tolerance argument, likewise the emotion-grabbing (and often argument-stopping) rhetoric of the freedom to love whomever one wills.

(As an aside, as a writing and rhetoric instructor I would add that the lack of critical thinking as opposed to “sound-byte-” or “meme-think” which is becoming the popular norm by which political activists often plead their cases nowadays, has also played a significant part. I am sure, at least I hope, that if people truly took the time and did the research necessary to adequately study this decision all the way to its logical and now legal conclusions, most would resist memethink for the greater good. I am not, however, holding my breath for that. Sadly.)

Additionally, in my opinion, recent successful litigation against the opposition to this, now, right (e.g., lawsuits brought and won against businesses that declined baking wedding cakes for same-sex marriages and other related litigation), has caused a kind of low-grade fever of fear, so to speak, that I believe successfully erodes the confidence of much of the opposition.

It is just much easier to switch the topic to tolerance and love than to face down the fear and focus on the bigger issue of what is really happening to our nation which is what we—both sides—really should fear.

Cooler heads must prevail—for all of our sakes, pro, con, and neutral, on this issue or any other issue now vulnerable in open-season, as it were, on the rule of law.

By the SCOTUS jumping ship to legislate law instead of just reviewing law, as they are Constitutionally tasked, we now face two very serious challenges as a nation:

  1. That of making sure that true–and classically defined–tolerance remains for our already established rights, religious rights in particular, and
  2. That of respecting the fact that we face a new fight to remain/regain a nation of, for, and by the people now that the protections established to prevent power grabs by one or more branches of our government have been seriously compromised if not destroyed altogether.

As the little girl said, “We are not in Kansas anymore.”


[1]Personally, I align with the sustainability, if you will, naturally, nationally, traditionally, and morally of the original definition of marriage as articulated here:

“Marriage has historic, religious and moral content that goes back to the beginning of time, and I think a marriage is as a marriage has always been, between a man and a woman,” Hillary Clinton, 1999.

As a follower of Christ, I align with the definition as articulated here:

“He who created them from the beginning made them male and female, and said, ‘Therefore a man shall leave his father and his mother and hold fast to his wife, and the two shall become one flesh’” (Matt 19:4-5). Jesus.

[2] See here for a reference to the specifically defined duties of each branch of government.: http://www.regentsprep.org/regents/ushisgov/themes/government/3branches.htm

[3] Here is the PDF of the Court document on this decision providing full context: http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/14pdf/14-556_3204.pdf



Posted in Commentaries | Tagged , , | 5 Comments

On Discerning Your “Spiritual Gut,” Part 4: How to Hear that “Still, Small Voice” in the Midst of the Ruckus

Phyllis Beveridge Nissila

After the earthquake came a fire, but the LORD was not in the fire. And after the fire came a gentle whisper (1 Kings 19:12 NIV).

Sometimes we discern God’s directives in earthquakes and fires as referenced in the verse above, but we also perceive Him in that “whisper,” a.k.a. “still, small voice,” listed there, too.

But how does one hear the quiet directives, so to speak, when it seems that every day there’s increasing cacophony here, bedlam there, riots and war—and rumblings of more? Continue reading

Posted in Discerning your "spiritual gut", encouragement in hard times, end times news, end times spiritual survival, most recent posts, spiritual survival, spiritual transformation, survival tools | Tagged , , , , , , | 2 Comments

UPDATE:On Discerning Your “Spiritual Gut,” Part 3–Reminders

Phyllis Beveridge Nissila

(Early the next day): a reader with a particular set of skills reminds us of the wisdom of “hiding in plain sight,” while another reminds us of “keeping our spiritual bags packed.”

More on Discerning Your “Spiritual Gut” to come soon, that in these days of mounting fear and confusion, we might remain in the love, wisdom, and comfort of the Lord.

Who is not surprised by any of this.

Who knows “the end from the beginning.”

Be of good cheer.


Posted in Discerning your "spiritual gut", encouragement in hard times, end times news, end times spiritual survival, most recent posts | Tagged | 2 Comments

On Discerning Your “Spiritual Gut,” Part 3: AI Has Nothing on IXOYE– Read On

Phyllis Beveridge Nissila

The wind blows where it wishes and you hear the sound of it, but do not know where it comes from and where it is going; so is everyone who is born of the Spirit (John 3:8).

 Just as you do not know the path of the wind and how bones are formed in the womb of the pregnant woman, so you do not know the activity of God who makes all things (Ecclesiastes 11:5).

Computer systems engineers tell us that Artificial Intelligence (AI), once “plugged in,” is now able to leap tall computations in as fast as 2 to the 1,152nd power processing time.

Can’t wrap your mind around that? Me, either.

But we’d better pay attention to the ramifications of this if it is true that the upcoming “Jade Helm 15” activity in the U.S. starting this July is really a kind of beta testing for AI-controlled warfare.* Continue reading

Posted in Commentaries, devotionals and commentaries featuring technology, Discerning your "spiritual gut", encouragement in hard times, end times news, end times spiritual survival, most recent posts, spiritual survival, survival tools | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 7 Comments

The Truth About Reconciliation (by Cindy Burrell, Copyright 2015, All Rights Reserved)

NOTE: Today’s post is by blogger and author, Cindy Burrell. She blogs at http://www.hurtbylove.com/. She is an advocate for women and children affected by abusive relationships. She is the author of Why Is He So Mean To Me?, God is My Witness: Making a Case for Biblical Divorce, and Everything My Heart Seeks (a devotional). I believe Cindy’s observations are particularly important these days where in many corners of Christendom there seems to be a rush to “forgive and forget” certain crimes against women and children (and men, although they are in the minority) in order to “reconcile” relationships without proper discernment and safety measures put in place to protect the abused. Sometimes, “safety” (physical, mental, emotional, and/or spiritual) means to get away from the abuser. Jesus came to set the captives free. Continue reading

Posted in abuse, Christian Women Topics, encouragement in hard times, most recent posts | Tagged , | 4 Comments

On Discerning Your “Spiritual Gut,” Part 2: Something Wicked This Way Comes? Pray First

Phyllis Beveridge Nissila

Have you ever wondered how Jesus knew Judas Iscariot was the one who would betray Him?

Have you ever pondered why Jesus knew he could do little for people “in certain villages”? (Mark 6:5) (because of their unbelief,  Mark noted.)

Have you wondered why Jesus knew that some demons take fasting along with prayer, not just prayer alone, to cast out (Matthew 17:20)?

One answer is that He was in continual communication and prayer with God the Father. “I do what I see the Father doing” (John 5:19), He said. Continue reading

Posted in Commentaries, Discerning your "spiritual gut", encouragement in hard times, end times spiritual survival, most recent posts | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

On Discerning Your “Spiritual Gut,” Part 1: Get God’s Word On It!

Phyllis Beveridge Nissila


It’s amazing the stories you hear when this topic comes up “Have you ever had a ‘gut’ feeling about something?”

A teen-aged niece told me about a time when she and some friends were out in the country joy riding in the back-end of a pickup truck. They stopped for a few minutes and she had a strong feeling to get out of the truck and not go any further. She told the others to come back for her later. The rest of them hopped back in and the truck peeled out. Within a few minutes, the rig hit some kind of ridge in the gravel and flipped on its side. My niece would have been among those in the back who spilled out and sustained injuries. Continue reading

Posted in Devotionals, Discerning your "spiritual gut", end times spiritual survival, most recent posts, spiritual survival, survival tools | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments